Skip to content 
The Speaker of the House is elected by members of the House.
The process is political as well as constitutional.
When a new Congress begins, members vote for Speaker.
A candidate generally needs to secure enough votes to win under the applicable House rules.
The Speaker is therefore chosen through the legislative process—not appointed by the Supreme Court.
This is one reason readers should be cautious when encountering headlines implying that a court has simply declared a particular politician the next Speaker.
If such a remarkable development actually occurred, the details would need to be examined very carefully.
What Could a Supreme Court Decision Actually Do?
The Court could issue a ruling involving an election dispute, constitutional question, congressional procedure, or another matter with consequences for political power.
For example, a decision involving voting rights could affect future elections.
A ruling concerning executive authority could alter the balance between Congress and the presidency.
A case involving federal election law could influence how congressional contests are conducted.
But even when the consequences are politically significant, the legal decision itself needs to be understood on its own terms.
A headline can simplify a complicated ruling into a few dramatic words.
The underlying opinion may tell a very different story.
Why Political Headlines Often Leave Out the Key Detail
The phrase “Hakeem Jeffries Will Now Be…” creates a narrative gap.
The reader is encouraged to imagine the most dramatic possibility.
Will he become Speaker?
President?
Acting president?
A new constitutional officer?
The headline doesn’t say.